- Define the terminating conditions per access type — VPN and remote portals usually get shorter limits than interactive desktops — and write them down.
- Verify the settings on the systems that matter most: remote access infrastructure and administrative sessions, where an abandoned session is most valuable to an attacker.
3.1.11 — Session termination
3.1 Access Control · NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2 · The heading label is this site's navigational shorthand; the official language is the statement below.
Terminate (automatically) a user session after a defined condition.
NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2 — Protecting CUI in Nonfederal Systems ↗NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing Security Requirements for CUI ↗What this requirement is after
Beyond locking, sessions end. After a condition you define — hours of inactivity, end of a maintenance window, a detected anomaly — the session terminates and the user authenticates fresh, so forgotten connections do not live forever.
Brilliant at the Basics practices that support this requirement
The campaign’s twenty practices are a priority list, not a control catalog, and none of them works this requirement’s substance directly. It still applies to you if it is in your contract’s scope: address it through your own implementation and the related artifacts below, and treat the absence of a mapping here as honesty, not permission to skip it.
Implementation considerations and evidence
- The documented termination conditions per access type
- Session timeout configuration exports from VPN, portals, and servers
Templates and worksheets with a mapped relationship
No artifact in the library names this requirement yet. The library index groups everything by category and practice.
Where this lands in Rev. 3
Sources and review status
| Primary sources | NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2 — Protecting CUI in Nonfederal Systems · NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing Security Requirements for CUI |
|---|---|
| Review status | Pending NIST SME review |
| Content version | 1.0 |
| Updated |